﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Modesto Personal Injury Lawyer - General Personal Injury</title>
    <description>Injured? Contact a Modesto attorney for a free consultation. Serving victims of car accidents, truck crashes, dog attacks, nursing home abuse and neglect, wrongful death and other injuries arising from negligence.</description>
    <link>http://modesto.injuryboard.com/tag/General+Personal+Injury/</link>
    <atom:link href="http://modesto.injuryboard.com/tag/General+Personal+Injury/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>California Governor Lets Down Taxpayers and the Injured.</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Governor Schwarzenegger broke a promise to the taxpayers and injured consumers of the State of California when he failed sign &lt;a href="http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0051-0100/sb_93_cfa_20070918_145934_sen_comm.html"&gt;SB 93 (Corbett)&lt;/a&gt;.  The insurance industry has been artificially deflating the value of medical treatment for wrongfully injured people in this state for almost 20 years.  This has resulted in huge losses to state programs like Medi-Cal and to those people who are injured by tortuous conduct.  As a result, the insurance &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;industry has been receiving an enormous windfall, money that the industry should be paying instead of the taxpayers of this state.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It works like this.  The law states that an injured person is entitled to recover the reasonable value of the medical treatment they receive as a result of the wrongful conduct of another person.  Sounds simple, however, the insurance industry has been successfully arguing in court that the reasonable value of medical treatment is what the insurance industry pays through their contracts with medical providers.  This is where the train leaves the tracks.  This is because a health insurance company gets huge discounts from medical providers that regular folks aren't able to negotiate.  In exchange for the huge discounts, the health insurers give the hospitals all kinds of valuable benefits instead of money.  A few examples are: millions of patients without the need to advertise, fast guaranteed payment and uniform billing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So if a hospital would get paid $100.00 by you and me for a particular service.  They might only get paid $25.00 by a health insurance company.  But they also get all those valuable benefits in addition to the $25.00.  Once the case gets to trial, the insurance lawyer has been successfully persuading judges to only let you and me recover the $25.00.  (Which by the way, your health insurer wants reimbursed.)  If you are on Medi-Cal this means there is less money in the verdict to be reimbursed from and invariably the program doesn't get as much money back and the taxpayer has to pay.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;SB 93 would have fixed this insurance industry boon, by letting judges know that the amount paid by Medi-cal does not represent the reasonable value and is not admissible evidence for that proposition. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;This bill would prohibit consideration of the amount paid  by Medi-Cal for medical services provided to a beneficiary as evidence of past medical damages, or for the purpose of reducing the third party's liability to the beneficiary in any third-party action.  In effect, for purposes of measuring damages, an injured party who is a Medi-Cal beneficiary would be treated the same as any other injured party where a third party is found liable for the injuries.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; However, the Governor didn't see it that way and the insurance industry continues to keep money they are not entitled to keep at the expense of the taxpayers and injured people of California.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href="http://modesto.injuryboard.com/miscellaneous/california-governor-lets-down-taxpayers-and-the-injured.aspx?googleid=226000"&gt;Originally posted&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href="http://www.InjuryBoard.com"&gt;InjuryBoard&lt;/a&gt; by Larry Knapp</description>
      <link>http://modesto.injuryboard.com/miscellaneous/california-governor-lets-down-taxpayers-and-the-injured.aspx?googleid=226000</link>
      <source url="http://modesto.injuryboard.com/tag/General+Personal+Injury/">Modesto Personal Injury Lawyer - General Personal Injury</source>
      <category>Miscellaneous</category>
      <category>General Personal Injury</category>
      <dc:creator>Larry Knapp</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 08:29:39 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>QVC Issues Recall of Toasters Due to Fire Hazard</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The giant TV retailer &lt;a href="http://www.qvc.com/"&gt;QVC&lt;/a&gt; along with the U.S. &lt;a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/"&gt;CPSC&lt;/a&gt; has issued a &lt;a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml08/08001.html"&gt;recall &lt;/a&gt;for about 5,200 'Cook's Essential' Electric Toasters. There appears to be a risk of toasters catching on fire and burning up, and consumers who purchased these toasters from QVC should stop using them immediately.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;QVC has received ten reports of its "Cook's Essential" toasters turning on spontaneously, including one incident which resulted in fire damage to kitchen cabinets and two incidents in which toaster covers were burned.  The recall concerns toaster model CET 401, a four-slot stainless steel version of a traditional electric toaster.  Consumers are absolutely advised to unplug these toasters. &lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Consumers who purchased a "Cook's Essential" toaster Model CET 401 through QVC's shopping channel between January 2003 and June 2003 should contact QVC for a refund.  They can do so by calling QVC at (800) 367-9444, or by visiting QVC's web site at &lt;a href="http://www.qvc.com/qic/qvcapp.aspx/main.html.file.%7Crecalls,html?cm_re=HP-_-COPYRIGHT-_-PRODUCTRECALL"&gt;www.qvc.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For more information on this subject, please refer to the section on &lt;a href="http://www.injuryboard.com/view.cfm/Topic=30"&gt;Defective and Dangerous Products.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href="http://modesto.injuryboard.com/miscellaneous/qvc-issues-recall-of-toasters-due-to-fire-hazard.aspx?googleid=225566"&gt;Originally posted&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href="http://www.InjuryBoard.com"&gt;InjuryBoard&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href="http://www.injuryboard.com/Courtney-Mills/"&gt;Courtney Mills&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <link>http://modesto.injuryboard.com/miscellaneous/qvc-issues-recall-of-toasters-due-to-fire-hazard.aspx?googleid=225566</link>
      <source url="http://modesto.injuryboard.com/tag/General+Personal+Injury/">Modesto Personal Injury Lawyer - General Personal Injury</source>
      <category>Miscellaneous</category>
      <category>General Personal Injury</category>
      <dc:creator>Courtney Mills</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:11:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>